me LENTO DOLOROSO

header
I drove past true love,
once
in a dream.

like a house that caught fire
it burned and flamed.

and the magician disappeared
as quickly as he came
and with a sound like white magic caught in a black car's blazing trail.
thejogging:

Installation shot from The Jogging: Re-Mixology:
International Waters, 2012
1 part Fiji Bottled Water1 part Poland Spring Bottled Water1 part Evian Bottled Water1 part Dasani Bottled Water1 part Arrowhead Bottled Water1 part Voss Bottled Water1 part Smartwater Bottled Waterspritz with tap water
〰〰〰〰〰〰

thejogging:

Installation shot from The Jogging: Re-Mixology:

International Waters, 2012


1 part Fiji Bottled Water
1 part Poland Spring Bottled Water
1 part Evian Bottled Water
1 part Dasani Bottled Water
1 part Arrowhead Bottled Water
1 part Voss Bottled Water
1 part Smartwater Bottled Water
spritz with tap water

〰〰〰〰〰〰

(via dianarikaserong)

Comment   thejogging   3696 01.09.13
Zoom
  • audio
No information specified.
California Dreamin'
No information specified.
If You Can Believe Your Eyes And Ears
No information specified.
The Mamas & The Papas
360
Plays

herrherr:

The Mamas & The Papas - California Dreamin’

ratak-monodosico:

Googols and Googols

In 1938, mathematician Edward Kasner asked his nine-year-old nephew for a name for a large number—and his nephew promptly replied: “Googol.” A googol is a number equal to 10^100, or if you wanted to write it out, it would be a 1 with 100 zeroes following it. Already, this number is larger than the number of elementary particles in the known universe, which only amount to approximately 10^80. As if this wasn’t enough, the term was then extended to an even bigger number: a googolplex, which is 10 to the power of a googol—i.e., 10^(10^100). To write this out, it would be a 1 followed by a googol number of zeroes. Here’s where it gets intensely cool: you cannot physically write this number out in its entirety, because there is not enough space in the universe. Even if you wrote in unreadable one-point font, it would take up about 3.5×10^96 metres, while observable universe is only estimated to be 8.80×10^26 meters. So, you’d still need more paper than you could stuff into the entire universe—and furthermore, if you wrote at an average rate of two digits per second, it would take you more time to write it out than the age of the universe so far. And yet, even a googolplex comes nowhere near infinity. Numbers are awesome.
Watch Carl Sagan explain

ratak-monodosico:

Googols and Googols

In 1938, mathematician Edward Kasner asked his nine-year-old nephew for a name for a large number—and his nephew promptly replied: “Googol.” A googol is a number equal to 10^100, or if you wanted to write it out, it would be a 1 with 100 zeroes following it. Already, this number is larger than the number of elementary particles in the known universe, which only amount to approximately 10^80. As if this wasn’t enough, the term was then extended to an even bigger number: a googolplex, which is 10 to the power of a googol—i.e., 10^(10^100). To write this out, it would be a 1 followed by a googol number of zeroes. Here’s where it gets intensely cool: you cannot physically write this number out in its entirety, because there is not enough space in the universe. Even if you wrote in unreadable one-point font, it would take up about 3.5×10^96 metres, while observable universe is only estimated to be 8.80×10^26 meters. So, you’d still need more paper than you could stuff into the entire universe—and furthermore, if you wrote at an average rate of two digits per second, it would take you more time to write it out than the age of the universe so far. And yet, even a googolplex comes nowhere near infinity. Numbers are awesome.

Watch Carl Sagan explain

(via cuntilanak)

Comment   sciencesoup   2697 01.08.13
Zoom
  • audio
No information specified.
Cola
No information specified.
Anything In Return
No information specified.
Toro y Moi
1,569
Plays

toro y moi / cola

my favorite track

(via cuntilanak)

Comment   meetmeinmalkovich   127 01.08.13
explore-blog:

Oh hello there, F. Scott Fitzgerald in drag, 1916.
But don’t criticize, for Fitzgerald knows how to respond to hate mail.

explore-blog:

Oh hello there, F. Scott Fitzgerald in drag, 1916.

But don’t criticize, for Fitzgerald knows how to respond to hate mail.

Comment     525 01.08.13

(via gregorgy)

Comment   remain-reckless   12054 01.06.13

astronautte:

the human form in a trance is such a strange, volatile, beautiful being

Comment   astronautte   5 01.06.13

actuallygrimes:

I never really understood St. Vincent until very recently, I guess i never really gave it much of a legit listen before.  She is very good at expressing how alienated and empty musical success can make you feel.  I think a lot of artists try to broach this subject and it usually just feels really immature.  Like, “i have so much cocaine and so many hookers, but i am sad.”  Proud to be label mates with someone like her.

there’s something really awkward about her music and when you’ve embraced it you can realize how awesome she is.

Tagged: grimes, St. Vincent, .
Comment   actuallygrimes   267 01.03.13

書を捨てよ、町へ出よう

書を捨てよ、町へ出よう

(via dianarikaserong)

Comment   7678 01.02.13

Anything we should know about your change? 
Her eyes are waiting
This calls to panels sustained brown
Everyone’s tiring
September thudding quickens with a serious slope
We’re in it together but no one pulls

As soon as the circus disappears
Damaged goods, damaged goods
The saints only preach when the coast is clear
Damaged goods, damaged goods
The lines in your palm shouldn’t give you grief
Damaged goods, damaged goods
And quickly the bloom on the rose does leave
Damaged goods, damaged goods

No matter what he thought she was 
No matter what he thought she was before
Professional, a working stiff 
It’s over now, damaged goods 

No doubts, no doubts
What’s done is done

Comment   01.02.13
Comment   hikristofferson   2560 01.02.13
herrherr:

Amy Cutler

herrherr:

Amy Cutler

Comment   herrherr   6 01.02.13